AIS Research Insights

Browse the library 41 papers

All Artificial Intelligence & Automation Information Systems & Management Human-Computer Interaction Data Analytics & Big Data Digital Transformation & Strategy Cybersecurity & Privacy Cloud & Infrastructure E-Commerce & Digital Platforms Operations & Supply Chain Sustainability & Green IS

New

AI Processed Human Approved

How do sending and receiving emails shape employee stress and productivity?

Jean-François Stich

Email stress: Towards a new understanding of its causes and impacts

2025

Key findings

The paper proposes the Transactional Model of Email Stress (TMES), establishing that email stress is a dynamic process shaped by sender and receiver roles.
Sending emails generally triggers eustress, offering senders a sense of control, task delegation, and productivity.
Receiving emails primarily creates distress through incoming volume, constant interruptions, and emotional ambiguity in messages.
Targeted email training and explicit organizational communication norms can mitigate distress while preserving productivity benefits.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a discussion with your direct reports and heads of departments to explore piloting a specific email management training program for all employees, focusing on techniques that address both sender eustress and receiver distress, as outlined by the TMES model.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, review the current email client settings and identify opportunities to implement or enhance features that automatically categorize or filter incoming emails based on sender or keywords, thereby reducing receiver distress for your team.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, draft a proposal for a new organizational communication norm that encourages concise and action-oriented email content from senders, aiming to maximize sender eustress by clearly delegating tasks and minimizing receiver distress caused by ambiguity.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a research proposal to empirically test the TMES model by designing a study that measures sender eustress and receiver distress across different organizational contexts and email usage patterns.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, schedule a meeting with key stakeholders to discuss the development of an organizational policy that mandates specific email etiquette training, emphasizing balanced sender and receiver perspectives as informed by the TMES framework.

Email stress, Technostress, Overload, Hyperconnection, Eustress, Transactional model

AI Processed Human Approved

How do online reactions and bullying differ for young males and females posting about school shootings?

Gordon Amidu

Cyberbullying in Times of School Shootings: Effects on Youth Mental Health in the U.S.

2025

Key findings

Non-cyberbullying comments occurred significantly more frequently than cyberbullying comments across posts from both male and female youth creators.
Emotional trauma responses were the predominant cyberbullying behavior, comprising 52.69% of harassment on male posts and 63.97% on female posts, while aggression, sarcasm, and blame occurred less than expected.
Topic modeling revealed gendered discussion dynamics, where male posts prompted political discourse and threat-focused debates, while female posts elicited supportive, emotionally processing, and healing-oriented conversations.
Sentiment analysis indicated that posts by young females received a higher proportion of neutral comments and fewer negative reactions compared to posts by young males.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a review of existing content moderation policies and technologies to ensure they are sufficiently equipped to detect and flag 'emotional trauma responses' as a primary form of cyberbullying, particularly in the context of sensitive national crises, and prioritize implementing enhanced AI-driven sentiment analysis tools capable of nuanced interpretation.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a team meeting to brief the IT support staff on the research findings regarding gendered cyberbullying dynamics on platforms like TikTok, and instruct them to proactively monitor user reports for comments exhibiting 'emotional trauma responses' on posts related to sensitive topics, escalating any patterns or severe instances to the security team.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, task a cross-functional team (including marketing, communications, and product development) to analyze how the company's online platforms and content strategies can better support 'emotionally processing and healing-oriented conversations,' particularly in times of national crisis, drawing inspiration from the supportive dynamics observed on female youth posts.
Researcher: On Monday morning, design a follow-up study proposal that specifically investigates the efficacy of different intervention strategies for 'emotional trauma responses' in cyberbullying, perhaps comparing the impact of direct moderation versus community-driven support mechanisms on platforms like TikTok, with a focus on gendered responses.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, draft a policy brief to relevant stakeholders outlining the research findings on gendered cyberbullying and the prevalence of 'emotional trauma responses' during national crises, recommending the development of targeted digital literacy programs for youth that address empathetic online communication and healthy coping mechanisms for dealing with sensitive content.

cyberbullying, school shootings, TikTok, gender differences, sentiment analysis, youth mental health

AI Processed Human Approved

What forms of cyberbullying do adolescents experience in gamified TikTok trends, and how do they differ by gender?

Gordon Amidu

The Impact of Gamified Cyberbullying Trends on Adolescent Mental Health on TikTok in the U.S.

2025

Key findings

Non-cyberbullying comments comprised over 96% of all interactions, demonstrating the impact of automated platform moderation and bystander intervention.
Sexualization emerged as the predominant cyberbullying tactic, accounting for 92.46% of male-directed cyberbullying and 89.19% of female-directed cyberbullying.
Gendered patterns were prominent in topic modeling: male content elicited performance-based roasts, whereas female content attracted appearance-focused rating commentary.
Sentiment analysis showed that female adolescents received proportionally more neutral audience responses and fewer negative reactions than male peers.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: Initiate a review of the current content moderation algorithms and their effectiveness in identifying and flagging subtle forms of gamified cyberbullying, particularly sexualization and appearance-focused commentary, as outlined in the research. Schedule a follow-up meeting with the AI/ML team by Wednesday to discuss potential enhancements based on these findings.
IT Manager: Begin analyzing the platform's reporting mechanisms. Identify any user-facing features that might be inadvertently hindering adolescents from reporting gamified cyberbullying by making it appear 'playful'. Prepare a brief report by end of day Monday on potential UI/UX improvements for reporting tools, focusing on clarity and ease of use.
Business Strategist: Develop a preliminary risk assessment framework for new gamified campaign launches on TikTok. This framework should explicitly incorporate potential negative externalities like gamified cyberbullying and its gendered manifestations, as identified in the research, and assess how these risks might impact brand reputation and user engagement.
Researcher: Begin designing a follow-up study protocol. Focus on how to specifically capture and analyze 'playful' or gamified cyberbullying that might evade current detection methods, using the research findings on sexualization and appearance-based commentary as key indicators. Prioritize developing an analytical framework that distinguishes between genuine 'roasts' and harmful cyberbullying.
Policymaker: Draft a policy brief for internal review that outlines the need for updated platform guidelines. This brief should specifically address the challenge of gamified cyberbullying on platforms like TikTok, referencing the research's findings on sexualization and gendered patterns, and proposing that platforms implement clearer definitions and more robust enforcement mechanisms for these evolving forms of online harassment.

cyberbullying, gamification-trolling, TikTok, gender, adolescent online behavior, social media

AI Processed Human Approved

How do TikTok users respond when young adults share their struggles with depression?

Gordon Amidu

The Impact of Cyberbullying on Help-Seeking Among Depressed Young adults in the United States

2025

Key findings

Non-cyberbullying comments significantly outnumbered cyberbullying comments, accounting for 92.2% of overall engagement compared to 7.8% cyberbullying interactions.
Supportive responses were the most common interaction style (53.51%), followed by harmful (17.68%), dismissive (15.91%), sarcastic (8.83%), peer invalidation (3.42%), and blaming (0.65%) comments.
Sentiment analysis revealed that responses to depression-related content were predominantly neutral, reflecting cautious and non-judgmental user engagement.
Topic modeling identified five primary thematic areas in user discussions: Emotional Vulnerability, Identity Struggles, Social Connection, Negative Emotions, and Emotional Expression.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, direct your cybersecurity team to review existing platform moderation tools and policies for social media platforms commonly used by young adults, with a specific focus on identifying potential enhancements to detect and flag harmful comment patterns identified in the research (e.g., dismissive, sarcastic, peer invalidation).
IT Manager: On Monday morning, initiate a review of our internal IT support resources and documentation related to online safety and responsible social media use, ensuring it includes guidance on identifying and reporting cyberbullying, and consider adding specific examples of the types of harmful comments found in the research.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, task your market research team to analyze the brand's current social media engagement strategy on platforms like TikTok, specifically looking for opportunities to amplify supportive and positive content in response to mental health disclosures, and to identify potential risks associated with negative comment trends.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin planning your next research project by drafting a proposal to replicate this study's methodology on other emerging social media platforms or with different demographic groups to broaden the understanding of cyberbullying's impact on help-seeking behavior.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, schedule a meeting with your legislative aides to begin drafting policy recommendations that encourage social media platforms to implement more robust content moderation systems specifically designed to identify and mitigate cyberbullying that hinders vulnerable individuals from seeking help.

cyberbullying, mental health, TikTok, depression, social media harassment, help-seeking

AI Processed Human Approved

How common is body-related cyberbullying against adolescent girls on TikTok, and what forms does it take?

Gordon Amidu

Body Image Distress and Cyberbullying Among Adolescent Girls in the U.S.

2025

Key findings

Cyberbullying constituted 7.4% of total analyzed interactions, whereas non-cyberbullying comments comprised 92.6%.
Body shaming was the most prevalent cyberbullying behavior (41.68%), followed by insults (24.78%) and teasing (21.26%).
Neutral sentiment predominated user responses, followed by positive sentiment, with negative sentiment representing the smallest proportion.
Topic modeling revealed five primary themes: Appearance Monitoring, Body Commentary, Positive Affirmations, Social Comparison, and Identity Confusion.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: Initiate a review of existing content moderation algorithms and reporting mechanisms to assess their effectiveness in detecting and flagging body shaming, insults, and teasing comments related to appearance on platforms frequented by adolescent girls, aiming to prioritize enhancements for these specific issue types.
IT Manager: Schedule a technical deep-dive meeting with the content moderation team to present the research findings on the prevalence of body shaming and insults on TikTok, and collaboratively identify specific keyword filters and pattern recognition strategies to implement within current moderation tools to better catch these behaviors.
Business Strategist: Develop a proposal for a new product feature or marketing campaign that leverages positive affirmations and counter-narratives to combat social comparison and identity confusion related to body image on social media platforms, referencing the research's thematic analysis of positive affirmations as a potential intervention.
Researcher: Begin drafting a follow-up research proposal that specifically investigates the effectiveness of different types of content moderation (e.g., AI-driven vs. human) in mitigating body shaming and insult-based cyberbullying on TikTok, and proposes a quantitative analysis of user sentiment shifts post-intervention.
Policymaker: Draft a preliminary policy brief for the relevant government agency, highlighting the study's quantitative data on the percentage of cyberbullying and the specific themes of harassment (body shaming, insults), and outlining the urgent need for platform-specific regulations and youth mental health intervention funding to address appearance-centered online harassment.

Body shaming, Cyberbullying, Adolescent girls, TikTok, Online harassment

AI Processed Human Approved

How can universities better organize themselves to adapt and deliver effective online learning?

Indriani Noor Hapsari, Dana Indra Sensuse, Harry Budi Santoso, Indra Budi, Ryan Randy Suryono, Kautsarina

Improving Self-Organization Capability in e-Learning using Soft System Methodology: A Case from Indonesia

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) · 2024

Key findings

Identified four core dimensions influencing self-organization in higher education: strategic planning, personnel development, learning resource management, and IT capability.
Formulated seven actionable interventions, including establishing clear multi-year strategies, promoting open dialogue across faculties, visualizing workload allocations, and implementing collaborative feedback mechanisms for course design.
Highlighted the vital roles Information Systems play as enablers for group decision-making, performance tracking, knowledge sharing, and managing system dependencies.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a review of existing IT infrastructure and systems specifically identifying which ones are currently siloed and propose an initial phased approach (e.g., Phase 1: Integration of student information system with the learning management system) for breaking down these silos, with a preliminary timeline and resource estimate.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute check-in with a representative from the academic affairs department to discuss how existing IT systems can better support collaborative feedback mechanisms for course design, identifying one specific tool or feature that could be enhanced or implemented in the next sprint.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, draft a one-page outline for a multi-year e-learning strategy document, focusing on how to integrate the identified four core dimensions (strategic planning, personnel development, learning resource management, IT capability) into measurable objectives for the next academic year, and identify one key stakeholder group for initial feedback.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin compiling a list of existing open-dialogue platforms or communication channels within the university and identify two specific instances where they could be leveraged to facilitate cross-faculty discussions on e-learning best practices or challenges.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, draft a memo to the academic senate proposing a pilot program for a collaborative feedback mechanism for course design, outlining the key benefits, the intended process, and requesting their endorsement to explore its feasibility further.

soft-system methodology, self-organization, higher education, e-learning, information system, Indonesia

AI Processed Human Approved

What drives digital gullibility, and how can systems be designed to help users critically evaluate online information?

Margeret Hall, Christian Haas

A Research Agenda to Understand Drivers of Digital Gullibility

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) · 2022

Key findings

Frames digital gullibility as a key antecedent to maladaptive online behaviors rather than focusing solely on misinformation output.
Integrates socio-technical system principles with concepts like context collapse and network externalities to explain persistent online gullibility.
Formulates ten research propositions across three gaps: information context, individual seeking behavior, and realized behavior.
Provides actionable guidance for designing user-centric systems that enhance epistemic vigilance and reduce information verification costs.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a cross-departmental working group with representatives from Security, User Experience, and Training to review the research agenda's propositions, specifically focusing on how to integrate 'epistemic vigilance' enhancement into the next IT security awareness training module, prioritizing the 'information context' gap.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute review session with your team to discuss the concept of 'context collapse' as presented in the research and brainstorm one specific system design tweak (e.g., adding a 'source credibility' indicator to internal dashboards) that could reduce information verification costs for your users, to be piloted within the week.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, draft a one-page executive summary for your leadership team that translates the research's core finding on 'digital gullibility as an antecedent to maladaptive online behaviors' into a business risk, proposing a brief for exploring how to quantify the cost of digital gullibility within your organization's operations.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin a literature review focused on the 'individual seeking behavior' gap outlined in the research, specifically searching for empirical studies that measure user-reported 'epistemic vigilance' in different online environments to refine your next research question.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, draft an inquiry to relevant government agencies or industry bodies requesting current data on the prevalence and economic impact of 'digital scams' and 'phishing' within your jurisdiction, framing the request around understanding 'digital gullibility' as a root cause.

Digital gullibility, maladaptive outcomes, context collapse, network externalities, epistemic vigilance, socio-technical systems

AI Processed Human Approved

How do communities use social media to support mental health recovery during natural disasters?

Mohammad Ariful Islam, Julian Marx, Libo Liu, Ofir Turel

Digital Mental Health Resilience During Natural Disasters: A Scoping Review and Research Agenda

2025

Key findings

Identified seven key socio-technical themes describing how social media fosters mental health resilience across natural disaster phases.
Revealed that communities actively curate content and self-regulate online spaces to protect users from distress, misinformation, and trauma.
Demonstrated the importance of vulnerability-sensitive channels and cross-sector coordination among community groups, government agencies, and mental health providers.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, schedule a brief exploratory meeting with your innovation team to assess existing social media monitoring tools and identify potential enhancements for detecting and analyzing distress signals and misinformation during simulated disaster scenarios.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, review the current moderation policies for any public-facing community forums or social media channels managed by your organization, and identify specific criteria related to 'vulnerability-sensitive content' that could be integrated into moderation guidelines.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, initiate a conversation with your communications and marketing teams to explore how your organization's social media presence could be adapted to proactively offer mental health resources or foster supportive community interactions, especially in light of potential regional disaster risks.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a concise summary of the 'vulnerability-sensitive channels' and 'cross-sector coordination' findings from this review, identifying specific examples or hypothetical scenarios where these could be applied to digital mental health resilience research.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, draft a short memo to your relevant department heads, flagging the research finding on 'communities actively curate content and self-regulate online spaces' and suggesting a brief discussion on how public digital platforms could be better designed or supported to facilitate this self-regulation for mental health resilience during crises.

Social media, natural disasters, digital mental health resilience, community resilience, scoping review

AI Processed Human Approved

How can educators successfully use community partner projects to teach practical technology and project management skills?

Margeret Hall

Service Learning in Information Systems Education: Pedagogical Approaches to Support Experiential Learning and Higher-level Thinking

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) · 2018

Key findings

Integrating service learning into Information Systems classrooms increases student motivation and engagement by connecting technical tasks to pro-social community impacts.
Employing constructivist classroom management alongside Agile methodologies effectively supports higher-level thinking skills, including critical evaluation and self-reflection.
High team cohesion can be a double-edged sword, occasionally masking individual inefficiencies and inhibiting necessary exchanges with external stakeholders.
Assessing students on their execution of Agile project management processes rather than purely technical deliverables protects individual grading fairness and encourages risk-taking.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a pilot program to identify two to three non-profit organizations in our community that could benefit from IT support, and assign a dedicated internal IT liaison for each to manage the student engagement.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your team to brainstorm potential IT projects that could be beneficial for local non-profits, focusing on areas where student teams could realistically make an impact within a semester.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, reach out to a local community foundation or non-profit umbrella organization to understand their most pressing IT needs and explore potential service learning partnerships for future student projects.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a literature review section of your paper, specifically focusing on case studies of service learning in technical fields and the reported challenges and benefits of integrating Agile methodologies in such contexts.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, begin drafting a proposal for a new grant or funding initiative that encourages universities to partner with local non-profits for experiential learning opportunities in Information Systems, emphasizing the development of practical, community-focused IT skills.

Service Learning, IS Education, Constructivism, Bloom's Taxonomy, Experiential Learning

AI Processed Human Approved

How can visual tools help organizations understand and manage complex smart city mobility platforms?

Sven-Volker Rehm, Anne Faber, Lakshmi Goel

Visualizing Platform Hubs of Smart City Mobility Business Ecosystems

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) · 2017

Key findings

Implemented five distinct visualization techniques (Force-directed, Tree Map, Matrix, Radial Network, and Modified Ego-Network layouts) within a software prototype to match diverse stakeholder decision-making needs.
Demonstrated how macro-level visual analytics can uncover key industry players, platform overlaps, missing service niches, and dominant inter-firm relationships.
Conceptualized a framework showing how tailored ecosystem visualizations can stimulate vital knowledge flows across policy governance boards, commercial firms, and smart city citizen communities.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, review the 'business ecosystem explorer' software prototype documentation and identify which of the five visualization techniques (Force-directed, Tree Map, Matrix, Radial Network, Modified Ego-Network) are most technically feasible for immediate integration into existing smart city data infrastructure.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a brief technical assessment meeting with your team to evaluate the infrastructure requirements and potential integration points for a pilot implementation of one or two of the presented visualization techniques from the 'business ecosystem explorer' prototype.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, initiate a discussion with your cross-functional team to brainstorm specific strategic questions about our smart city mobility ecosystem that could be answered by analyzing platform overlaps, missing service niches, and dominant inter-firm relationships using the described macro-level visual analytics.
Researcher: On Monday morning, analyze the research paper's findings on how tailored ecosystem visualizations stimulate knowledge flows and identify which specific visualization technique and corresponding stakeholder group (policy governance, commercial firms, citizen communities) offers the most promising avenue for a follow-up research experiment.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, identify a key policy governance challenge related to smart city mobility coordination and consider how a macro-level visualization of platform hubs, as described in the research, could provide actionable insights to address this challenge.

Digital platform, business ecosystem, smart city, visualization, knowledge flow

AI Processed Human Approved

How can collaborative software be designed so domain experts can configure it for their specific needs?

Sven-Volker Rehm, Thomas Reschenhofer, Klym Shumaiev

IS Design Principles for Empowering Domain Experts in Innovation: Findings From Three Case Studies

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) · 2014

Key findings

Identified key design principles for domain expert configurable software, including iterative modeling, content-context relation, information re-use, function re-use, and context alignment.
Highlighted the essential role of 'facilitators' as mediating agents who help bridge technical configuration mechanisms with business domain requirements.
Demonstrated that domain expert configuration provides a flexible, cost-effective method to align IT support with dynamic inter-organizational innovation processes.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, schedule a brief meeting with your innovation network leads to discuss the potential of 'domain expert configuration' for upcoming projects, specifically asking them to identify one current pain point related to rigid software that could be addressed by such a system.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, review your current internal documentation for any existing examples of 'facilitators' – individuals who successfully bridge technical and business needs – and plan a quick chat with one of them to understand their approach.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, draft a one-page concept document outlining how a more flexible, domain expert-configurable information system could accelerate a specific strategic innovation initiative, focusing on the benefits of rapid adaptation to diverse partner needs.
Researcher: On Monday morning, identify three publicly available collaborative information systems (e.g., wikis, content management systems) that exhibit elements of 'content-context relation' or 'information re-use' and briefly document how they do so.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, review existing procurement guidelines for IT systems to identify any clauses that might hinder the adoption of flexible, configurable solutions, and consider proposing a pilot program to test the effectiveness of domain expert configuration for inter-organizational projects.

Domain expert configuration, design science, innovation networks, domain knowledge, design principles, case study

AI Processed Human Approved

How can organizations define and select performance indicators for collaborative business networks?

Montijn van de Ven, Paola Lara Machado, Banu Aysolmaz, Oktay Turetken

Managing Performance in Collaborative Networks: A Method for Defining Key Performance Indicators for Collaborative Business Models

Business & Information Systems Engineering · 2026

Key findings

Introduced a three-step method covering KPI specification, multi-criteria KPI selection, and attribute operationalization.
Differentiated KPI scopes into network, subnet, and actor levels to balance network alignment with individual flexibility.
Demonstrated practical utility through business scenarios including car navigation services, urban indoor farming, and sustainable households.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a pilot project to apply the three-step KPI definition method to one specific collaborative network your organization participates in, focusing on identifying and documenting initial network-level KPIs using your existing data infrastructure.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a working session with a key business stakeholder from a collaborative project to begin the 'KPI specification' step of the research method, focusing on articulating the desired outcomes for that specific collaboration.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, review the research's findings on differentiating KPI scopes and draft a preliminary list of potential network, subnet, and actor-level KPIs for a newly forming collaborative initiative.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin designing a case study to apply and further refine the proposed KPI definition method within a new collaborative business scenario, focusing on the 'multi-criteria KPI selection' and 'attribute operationalization' steps.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, identify a specific public-private collaborative initiative and begin exploring how the research's approach to KPI definition could be adapted to measure its network-wide alignment and individual actor contributions effectively.

Business models, Collaborative business models, Collaborative networks, Key performance indicators, Performance management, Design science research

AI Processed Human Approved

How do laws banning businesses from suppressing negative reviews affect online customer ratings?

Aida Sanatizadeh, Gordon Burtch, Yili Hong, Yuheng Hu

Can Regulation Restore Authenticity? Evidence from Policies Against Online Review Suppression

Information Systems Research · 2025

Key findings

Following the CRFA enactment, U.S. hotel reviews became systematically more negative in both star ratings and textual sentiment.
Reviews became significantly longer on average, indicating that consumers shared more detailed feedback once legal risks were mitigated.
Rating declines were most concentrated among less reputable hotels and those in highly competitive local markets, which previously suppressed negative reviews more aggressively.
The policy's effects were strongest among American reviewers and users with longer platform tenure.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, initiate a review of our internal policies and legal contracts to ensure no clauses inadvertently threaten or discourage customers from providing honest feedback on public review platforms.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, task your team with monitoring online review platforms for any patterns of review suppression tactics being used by our competitors, specifically looking for increases in negative reviews that are quickly removed or challenged.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, analyze recent customer feedback data, particularly any negative reviews received in the last quarter, and assess if there are opportunities to engage with these customers to improve our offerings and address concerns openly.
Researcher: On Monday morning, identify and gather publicly available datasets on consumer review sentiment and volume for companies in sectors known for aggressive review suppression prior to recent regulatory changes, to replicate or extend the findings on the CRFA.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, schedule a meeting with your legislative staff to discuss potential avenues for expanding regulatory protections to cover other forms of consumer feedback, such as social media comments or product testimonials, building upon the success of the CRFA.

Consumer Review Fairness Act, Online Reviews, Review Suppression, Chilling Effect, Digital Platforms, Consumer Protection

AI Processed Human Approved

How can AI governance be adapted to fit local cultural and ethical values around the world?

Dimitrios Symeonidis, Johannes Schneider, Anastasija Nikiforova

TOWARD CULTURAL–ETHICAL FIT IN AI GOVERNANCE: A GLOBAL TYPOLOGY OF GOVERNANCE PROFILES

ECIS 2026 · 2026

Key findings

Identified eight distinct ideal-type AI governance profiles reflecting specific cultural and ethical alignments: group fairness, individual fairness, market-led growth, value-led growth, human oversight fortress, autonomous growth, individual control, and collective security.
Demonstrated that global AI governance is structured by two key meta-tensions: social justice versus economic competitiveness, and autonomy versus security and control.
Formulated three theoretical propositions outlining how cultural alignment determines governance legitimacy, shapes patterns of societal resistance, and guides regulatory evolution over time.
Offered a diagnostic decision framework for policymakers to adapt international AI guidelines to local socio-cultural contexts without sacrificing core safety requirements.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute deep dive with your legal and ethics teams to identify which of the eight AI governance profiles identified in the research most closely aligns with your organization's current AI development and deployment practices, and flag any immediate misalignments.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, initiate a review of your team's current AI project documentation and development methodologies, specifically looking for instances where decisions about fairness, transparency, or accountability might have been implicitly influenced by a single cultural perspective (e.g., U.S.-centric) and note them for further discussion.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, begin analyzing your organization's key international markets and identify the primary cultural value orientations that characterize them, then cross-reference this with the meta-tensions (social justice vs. economic competitiveness, autonomy vs. security) to anticipate potential governance friction for upcoming AI initiatives.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a short literature review outline focusing on how cultural value orientations (e.g., individualism vs. collectivism) have historically shaped the adoption and regulation of other transformative technologies (e.g., the internet, biotechnology) to draw parallels with AI governance.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, review the 'diagnostic decision framework' mentioned in the research, and identify one specific AI guideline (e.g., data privacy regulations) that your jurisdiction currently applies universally, then brainstorm how to adapt its interpretation to better fit the dominant cultural value orientations of your primary constituent groups.

AI governance, cultural values, governance typology, ethical AI, regulatory design

AI Processed Human Approved

How does adopting smart speakers change how consumers search for, buy, and consume digital content?

Yoonseock Son, Wonseok Oh, Il Im

THE VOICE OF COMMERCE: HOW SMART SPEAKERS RESHAPE DIGITAL CONTENT CONSUMPTION AND PREFERENCES

MIS Quarterly · 2023

Key findings

Smart speaker adoption led to a 21.5% increase in monthly VOD content expenditures, alongside a 3.0% decrease in average content completion rates.
The increase in purchases is driven by lowered search friction, resulting in more search incidences, higher conversion rates, and less labor-intensive evaluation of content.
Using smart speakers for conversational purposes beyond simple informational queries amplifies the positive impact of device adoption on sales.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, task your team with investigating integration points between existing VOD platforms and major smart speaker voice assistant APIs (e.g., Alexa, Google Assistant) to enable seamless content discovery and playback via voice commands.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, analyze the current VOD platform's data infrastructure to identify how to track and log voice-initiated search queries and content playback events, distinguishing them from traditional remote control interactions.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, initiate a brainstorm session to explore new content promotion strategies that leverage voice-activated search, considering how to make titles more discoverable through natural language queries and conversational recommendations.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin outlining a follow-up study to quantify the correlation between specific conversational voice interactions (beyond simple search) and increased VOD content consumption, perhaps through A/B testing of voice-guided discovery features.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, convene a working group to assess the potential implications of increased voice-activated content consumption on digital accessibility standards and to explore how to ensure equitable access to content across all user interfaces.

Voice channel, search, smart speaker, digital content, econometrics

AI Processed Human Approved

How does collaborative course redesign affect student performance, teaching consistency, and instructor confidence?

John Michael Muraski, Donald H. Heath, Michael A. Eierman, Michael Patton

Efficacy Beliefs and Outcomes: Socio-Cognitive Perspectives on a Faculty-Led coP

AIS SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research (SIGED) · 2023

Key findings

Student performance showed consistent, measurable gains across multiple semesters following the course redesign, as demonstrated by improved pre- and post-test assessment deltas.
Participation in the community of practice positively impacted instructors' self-efficacy beliefs, with vicarious learning and peer verbal persuasion emerging as key drivers of confidence.
The collaborative approach established high course consistency across sections while creating a durable, supportive framework for peer mentoring and ongoing curriculum enhancement.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your IT academic technology support lead to explore a pilot program implementing a Communities of Practice model for a high-enrollment introductory course, using the provided research as a framework for discussion on potential student outcome improvements and faculty development.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, gather the instructors for the introductory information systems course for a 45-minute session. Share the key findings of this research, specifically highlighting the gains in student performance and instructor self-efficacy. Then, collaboratively brainstorm one small, concrete change to the course syllabus or assessment that can be implemented next semester as a collective first step towards greater consistency.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, analyze the current onboarding and ongoing professional development process for new faculty teaching foundational courses. Identify any gaps in collaborative support and informal learning opportunities, and consider how principles from this research, such as vicarious learning and peer persuasion, could be integrated into existing programs to improve faculty confidence and course consistency.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a proposal for a follow-up study. Focus on investigating the specific mechanisms of vicarious learning and peer verbal persuasion within the identified Community of Practice, perhaps through targeted surveys or observation protocols, to quantify their impact on instructor self-efficacy and to better understand how to scale these findings.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, initiate a discussion with the Provost's office and the Faculty Senate leadership to present the findings of this research. Propose the development of a university-wide framework or grant program that incentivizes and supports the formation of faculty Communities of Practice for foundational courses, emphasizing the potential for improved student learning outcomes and faculty development.

Community of Practice, Self-Efficacy, Course Redesign, Social Cognitive Theory, Information Systems Education, Participatory Action Research

AI Processed Human Approved

How can practitioner researchers overcome the divide between academia and industry to create real-world impact?

Stephen McCarthy, Hendrik Scholta, Geir Inge Hausvik, Peter André Busch

Boundary Spanning and Practical Impact in IS Research: A Bourdieusian Analysis

Information Systems Journal (ISJ) · 2025

Key findings

IS practitioner doctorates facilitate knowledge exchange through boundary-spanning activities including research design adaptation, multi-channel dissemination, and creating symbolic discourse.
Practical impact progresses through proof-of-concept, proof-of-value, and proof-of-use stages, each requiring different combinations of social, cultural, economic, and symbolic capital.
Environmental forces such as academic vs. practice doxa (institutional norms) and habitus (professional dispositions) create positional conflicts that require active negotiation and tailored incentives to sustain engagement.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your direct reports to initiate a 'practice impact review' focused on one ongoing IS project. Ask each person to identify one specific academic insight or research finding from a recent external study or internal research initiative that could be directly applied to improve that project's current proof-of-concept or proof-of-value stage, and assign them to explore this application by end of week.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, identify one specific, recent academic paper or conference proceeding relevant to a current team challenge. Forward this paper to your team with a concise note asking for a brief, 1-2 sentence summary of its most practical takeaway and how it *might* apply to your current proof-of-value stage objective by Tuesday afternoon.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, review the key performance indicators (KPIs) of one strategic business initiative currently underway. Identify which KPIs are not meeting expectations and, using the 'proof-of-value' framework, draft a one-page hypothesis on how a novel IS application or process, potentially informed by academic research, could demonstrably improve these specific KPIs within the next quarter.
Researcher: On Monday morning, select one recent academic publication where you are the lead author and identify its 'proof-of-use' stage potential. Draft a single-slide executive summary that articulates the core problem addressed, the practical solution proposed, and one tangible benefit for a specific industry practitioner role (e.g., IT manager, business analyst), and share it with three relevant practitioner contacts for feedback by Wednesday.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, review the current grant application criteria for technology innovation funding. Identify if and how 'demonstrable practical impact' is explicitly assessed, and draft a brief proposal to incorporate a specific requirement for applicants to detail their strategy for achieving 'proof-of-value' or 'proof-of-use' within a defined timeframe, alongside theoretical contributions.

academia-practice gap, boundary spanning, design science research, engaged IS scholarship, practical impact, theory of practice

AI Processed Human Approved

How do virtual worlds help people with lifelong disabilities move from social isolation to social inclusion?

Karen Stendal, Maung K. Sein, Devinder Thapa

Affordance-Based Pathway Model of Social Inclusion: A Case Study of Virtual Worlds and People With Lifelong Disability

Journal of the Association for Information Systems · 2026

Key findings

Identified three functional affordances (communicability, mobility, and personalizability) and two social affordances (engageability and self-actualizability) crucial for social inclusion.
Established that the actualization of functional affordances enables and dynamically interacts with social affordances to foster interpersonal relationships and community participation.
Discovered that outcomes achieved by actualizing specific affordances serve as facilitating conditions that support the perception and realization of additional affordances.
Extended affordance theory by demonstrating a feedback loop where social engagement refines and enhances the perception and use of basic functional capabilities.

What it means for you

CIO / IT Executive: On Monday morning, task your accessibility team to conduct an initial assessment of our current platform's 'communicability' features (e.g., real-time chat, group messaging, avatar-based interaction quality) against the research's identified functional affordances to understand potential barriers and opportunities for individuals with disabilities.
IT Manager: On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute working session with your frontline support staff to review existing user feedback logs for mentions of difficulty with navigation, communication, or customization within our virtual environment, specifically looking for patterns that might align with limitations in perceived 'mobility' or 'personalizability' affordances.
Business Strategist: On Monday morning, initiate a competitive analysis focusing on how emerging virtual platforms or digital communities are leveraging 'engageability' and 'self-actualizability' affordances to foster user connection and content creation, particularly noting any strategies that might appeal to or benefit users with disabilities.
Researcher: On Monday morning, begin drafting a protocol for a pilot study within our organization's virtual world that focuses on measuring the impact of enhanced 'communicability' features on user-reported feelings of 'engageability' and 'self-actualizability' among a diverse user group, potentially including participants with disabilities.
Policymaker: On Monday morning, convene a brief meeting with your advisory committee to discuss how current digital inclusion policies might be strengthened by explicitly incorporating the research's identified 'functional affordances' (communicability, mobility, personalizability) and 'social affordances' (engageability, self-actualizability) as measurable criteria for assessing technological accessibility and support for social participation.

Social Inclusion, Virtual Worlds, People With Lifelong Disability, Affordances, Second Life, ICT

Load More Showing 18 of 41