Browse the library

79 insights from AIS journals, conferences and related outlets. Most start with the question they answer.

Got a research question instead? Ask AIS Insights

Showing all 19 insights

Illustration for: How can organizations define and select performance indicators for collaborative business networks?

Key question

How can organizations define and select performance indicators for collaborative business networks?

Managing Performance in Collaborative Networks: A Method for Defining Key Performance Indicators for Collaborative Business Models
van de Ven, Machado, Aysolmaz, et al. · Business & Information Systems Engineering · 2026

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, initiate a pilot project to apply the three-step KPI definition method to one specific collaborative network your organization participates in, focusing on identifying and documenting initial network-level KPIs using your existing data infrastructure.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, schedule a working session with a key business stakeholder from a collaborative project to begin the 'KPI specification' step of the research method, focusing on articulating the desired outcomes for that specific collaboration.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, review the research's findings on differentiating KPI scopes and draft a preliminary list of potential network, subnet, and actor-level KPIs for a newly forming collaborative initiative.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin designing a case study to apply and further refine the proposed KPI definition method within a new collaborative business scenario, focusing on the 'multi-criteria KPI selection' and 'attribute operationalization' steps.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, identify a specific public-private collaborative initiative and begin exploring how the research's approach to KPI definition could be adapted to measure its network-wide alignment and individual actor contributions effectively.
Illustration for: How can organizations successfully implement digital identity wallets and overcome common adoption challenges?

Key question

How can organizations successfully implement digital identity wallets and overcome common adoption challenges?

Digital Identity Wallets: A Guide to the EU’s New Identity Model
Kudra, Rieger, Sedlmeir, et al. · Information Systems Journal · 2026

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Schedule a 30-minute internal briefing for your core IT leadership team to present the attached research summary and assign a point person to investigate the 'technical maturity' obstacles identified in the key findings within the context of our existing identity and access management infrastructure.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, compile a list of all current third-party single sign-on providers used by the organization and identify which of these might be candidates for integration or replacement with a digital identity wallet solution in the future, flagging any immediate integration challenges or risks.
  • Business Strategist Dedicate one hour on Monday morning to reviewing the 'ecosystem value co-creation' challenges mentioned in the research and brainstorm at least three potential business use cases within our organization where a digital identity wallet could unlock new revenue streams or significantly improve customer experience.
  • Researcher Begin analyzing the 12 practical experience case studies mentioned in the research by focusing on the 'organizational integration' obstacles. Identify and document recurring themes and successful mitigation strategies from at least three diverse industry examples to inform our own adoption framework.
  • Policymaker Initiate a dialogue with legal and compliance teams on Monday morning to assess the implications of the 2026 EU mandate for digital wallet support, specifically identifying any current regulatory gaps or areas where policy clarification will be needed to facilitate the adoption of wallet-based identity models.
Illustration for: How can AI governance be adapted to fit local cultural and ethical values around the world?

Key question

How can AI governance be adapted to fit local cultural and ethical values around the world?

Toward Cultural–Ethical Fit in AI Governance: A Global Typology of Governance Profiles
Symeonidis, Schneider, Nikiforova · ECIS · 2026

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute deep dive with your legal and ethics teams to identify which of the eight AI governance profiles identified in the research most closely aligns with your organization's current AI development and deployment practices, and flag any immediate misalignments.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, initiate a review of your team's current AI project documentation and development methodologies, specifically looking for instances where decisions about fairness, transparency, or accountability might have been implicitly influenced by a single cultural perspective (e.g., U.S.-centric) and note them for further discussion.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, begin analyzing your organization's key international markets and identify the primary cultural value orientations that characterize them, then cross-reference this with the meta-tensions (social justice vs. economic competitiveness, autonomy vs. security) to anticipate potential governance friction for upcoming AI initiatives.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin drafting a short literature review outline focusing on how cultural value orientations (e.g., individualism vs. collectivism) have historically shaped the adoption and regulation of other transformative technologies (e.g., the internet, biotechnology) to draw parallels with AI governance.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, review the 'diagnostic decision framework' mentioned in the research, and identify one specific AI guideline (e.g., data privacy regulations) that your jurisdiction currently applies universally, then brainstorm how to adapt its interpretation to better fit the dominant cultural value orientations of your primary constituent groups.
Illustration for: How does making conversational agents appear more human affect customer reactions when errors occur?

Key question

How does making conversational agents appear more human affect customer reactions when errors occur?

Artificial Normality: How Conversational Agents’ Perceived Humanness Inhibits Error Attribution and Preserves Satisfaction
Brendel, Lichtenberg, Hildebrandt, et al. · Journal of Management Information Systems · 2026

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, allocate budget to pilot the integration of more human-centric design principles (e.g., nuanced language, empathetic phrasing) into our core customer-facing conversational agent, focusing on areas where process errors are most common, to preemptively reduce user error attribution and maintain satisfaction.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, task your development team to review our current conversational agent's dialogue logs for instances of process errors and identify the top 3 most frequent error types to begin redesigning their responses with more humanlike cues (e.g., slight pauses, conversational fillers) to normalize the situation for users.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, initiate a cross-functional workshop with marketing and product development to explore how to strategically position our conversational agents' perceived humanness in customer communications, emphasizing its role in creating a seamless experience even when minor technical glitches occur.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin designing a follow-up study that experimentally manipulates specific humanlike conversational features (e.g., varying levels of politeness, acknowledgment of difficulty) within a simulated error scenario to quantify their direct impact on error attribution and situational normality, building upon the findings of Artificial Normality.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, convene a small working group to draft guidelines for the ethical development of conversational agents, recommending that AI design standards encourage the incorporation of humanlike qualities to enhance user experience and mitigate negative reactions to inevitable system errors, rather than solely focusing on pure efficiency.
Illustration for: How can educators effectively teach modern industrial software skills without expensive physical equipment?

Key question

How can educators effectively teach modern industrial software skills without expensive physical equipment?

Towards Design Principles for Teaching Industry 4.0 Competencies to CS/IS Students
Salcher · ECIS · 2026

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Direct your enterprise architecture team to draft a transition plan to replace physical IT hardware training labs with virtualized, containerized sandbox environments (e.g., Docker/Kubernetes) to reduce infrastructure costs and align onboarding with modern Industry 4.0 software architectures.
  • IT Manager Review the programming prerequisites of your junior developers and assign them a structured, hands-on troubleshooting task using a containerized microservice mock-up on Monday morning to assess their readiness for complex Industry 4.0 integration projects.
  • Business Strategist Reallocate a portion of next quarter's talent development budget away from high-cost physical equipment training and toward scalable, software-based virtual simulators to cost-effectively build digital twin and data architecture competencies.
  • Researcher Draft a research proposal to conduct a multi-institution comparative study on these eight design principles, incorporating objective pre- and post-intervention technical testing rather than relying on subjective student feedback to measure competency gains.
  • Policymaker Create a state-level educational grant initiative that incentivizes higher education institutions to update computer science curricula with virtualization-based Industry 4.0 frameworks, shifting funding priority away from physical learning factories.
Illustration for: What competing tensions and trade-offs do leaders face when guiding national quantum computing ecosystems?

Key question

What competing tensions and trade-offs do leaders face when guiding national quantum computing ecosystems?

Orchestration Paradoxes in National Quantum Computing Innovation Ecosystems
Taipale, Tyrväinen, Tuunanen, et al. · ECIS · 2026

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Schedule a 9:00 AM meeting with your lead enterprise architect to audit your current quantum-readiness roadmap, establishing a formal policy that divides software development and hardware access investments 50/50 to hedge against the performance tension of committing prematurely to a single unproven hardware stack.
  • IT Manager Create a bi-weekly 1-hour 'Quantum Cross-Training' slot in your team's calendar starting this Friday, pairing your specialized quantum physics PhDs with your generalist cloud engineers to address the learning tension between narrow technical specialization and broad-based systems integration.
  • Business Strategist Perform a revenue dependency audit to calculate the percentage of your quantum business unit's funding derived from state grants versus commercial clients, and draft a pitch deck for two private-sector pilots to actively transition away from 'godfather' state-funding reliance.
  • Researcher Draft a pre-competitive collaboration agreement template to send to a peer researcher at a competing institution, outlining a shared framework for baseline algorithm testing while clearly defining IP boundaries to manage the tension of collaboration versus resource competition.
  • Policymaker Draft a revision for the upcoming national quantum funding round guidelines that introduces a 'co-investment requirement,' mandating that state-funded consortia secure at least 25% of their budget from private corporate buyers to counter the 'godfather' dependency paradox.
Illustration for: How does delisting a privacy coin from a major exchange impact its price over time?

Key question

How does delisting a privacy coin from a major exchange impact its price over time?

Are the Regulators Winning the Fight with Anonymity-Enhancing Coins? Studying Binance’s European Delisting of Monero as a Natural Experiment
Renwick, Gleasure · ECIS · 2026

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Audit our organization's digital asset holdings and treasury to identify any exposure to privacy coins like Monero, and immediately initiate a migration plan to convert these assets to compliant, liquid cryptocurrencies to avoid permanent valuation loss from regulatory delistings.
  • IT Manager Update network monitoring tools and firewall rules to detect and block any Monero nodes, mining scripts, or wallet connections on company-owned infrastructure to prevent compliance violations arising from tightening centralized exchange regulations.
  • Business Strategist Review our payment gateway integrations and product roadmap to remove Monero or other privacy coins as accepted payment methods, and pivot our privacy-focused initiatives toward compliant layer-2 scaling solutions (like Zero-Knowledge rollups) that satisfy regulators.
  • Researcher Draft a new research proposal to apply the synthetic control method to other privacy-centric assets (like Zcash or Dash) across different geographic regions, incorporating decentralized exchange (DEX) trading volumes to test if the value shifted off centralized order books.
  • Policymaker Draft an amendment to the national crypto-asset regulatory framework to mandate that all registered centralized exchanges delist anonymity-enhancing coins, citing this empirical evidence that exchange-level bans are highly effective at permanently reducing these assets' market value and liquidity.
Illustration for: How can practitioner researchers overcome the divide between academia and industry to create real-world impact?

Key question

How can practitioner researchers overcome the divide between academia and industry to create real-world impact?

Boundary Spanning and Practical Impact in IS Research: A Bourdieusian Analysis
McCarthy, Scholta, Hausvik, et al. · Information Systems Journal · 2025

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your direct reports to initiate a 'practice impact review' focused on one ongoing IS project. Ask each person to identify one specific academic insight or research finding from a recent external study or internal research initiative that could be directly applied to improve that project's current proof-of-concept or proof-of-value stage, and assign them to explore this application by end of week.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, identify one specific, recent academic paper or conference proceeding relevant to a current team challenge. Forward this paper to your team with a concise note asking for a brief, 1-2 sentence summary of its most practical takeaway and how it *might* apply to your current proof-of-value stage objective by Tuesday afternoon.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, review the key performance indicators (KPIs) of one strategic business initiative currently underway. Identify which KPIs are not meeting expectations and, using the 'proof-of-value' framework, draft a one-page hypothesis on how a novel IS application or process, potentially informed by academic research, could demonstrably improve these specific KPIs within the next quarter.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, select one recent academic publication where you are the lead author and identify its 'proof-of-use' stage potential. Draft a single-slide executive summary that articulates the core problem addressed, the practical solution proposed, and one tangible benefit for a specific industry practitioner role (e.g., IT manager, business analyst), and share it with three relevant practitioner contacts for feedback by Wednesday.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, review the current grant application criteria for technology innovation funding. Identify if and how 'demonstrable practical impact' is explicitly assessed, and draft a brief proposal to incorporate a specific requirement for applicants to detail their strategy for achieving 'proof-of-value' or 'proof-of-use' within a defined timeframe, alongside theoretical contributions.
Illustration for: How can artificial intelligence simplify complex privacy policies while maintaining their essential legal accuracy?

Key question

How can artificial intelligence simplify complex privacy policies while maintaining their essential legal accuracy?

Automated Privacy Policy Simplification through a GPT-Powered Chrome Extension
Al Jabor, Astaneh, Mohanty, et al. · ICIS · 2025

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, initiate a pilot program to evaluate the integration of a GPT-powered privacy policy simplification Chrome extension across a select department, focusing on user adoption and feedback regarding usability and perceived value.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, prepare a technical feasibility assessment for deploying the developed Chrome extension across the organization's standard user workstations, outlining any necessary infrastructure changes or security considerations.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, analyze how the real-time privacy policy simplification and Q&A features of the Chrome extension can be leveraged to enhance user trust and potentially create a competitive differentiator for our online services.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin designing an experiment to test the effectiveness of the audience-adjusted rewriting prompt ('rewrite so a 10th-grade student can understand while maintaining legal accuracy') with a new set of privacy policies from a different industry sector.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, review the research findings on improved readability and content preservation to draft talking points for discussions on enhancing consumer understanding of digital service terms and conditions.
Illustration for: How do technology projects affect local communities, and what determines whether they succeed or fail?

Key question

How do technology projects affect local communities, and what determines whether they succeed or fail?

Ethics-based ontology in ICT4D
Thapa · Information Technology for Development · 2025

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your ICT4D project leads to introduce the concept of an 'ethics-based ontology' and ask them to identify one project where technology is deeply integrated into user workflows and cultural practices. Assign them to bring initial thoughts on how the project's impact on lived experience and moral agency could be assessed in the next project review.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, review the support tickets and user feedback logs from the last quarter for your current ICT4D deployment. Specifically, look for recurring issues that are not purely technical but seem to relate to user frustration, resistance to adoption, or a perception of technology not fitting their daily routines. Flag these for further investigation with your team.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, identify your organization's most critical ICT4D initiative. Draft a brief memo outlining how you plan to evaluate its success not just on efficiency metrics but also on its impact on the dignity, agency, and cultural integrity of the end-users. Prepare to discuss this revised evaluation framework with your team by the end of the week.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, revisit the 'implementation challenges' section of the research paper and select ONE challenge (e.g., translating abstract concepts into practical design metrics). Begin drafting a short (1-page) proposal for how you might operationalize this concept for a future ICT4D project you are involved in, focusing on a tangible measurement.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, review existing national or organizational guidelines for technology procurement and deployment in development contexts. Identify sections that address user impact, cultural sensitivity, or long-term sustainability. Draft a short list of questions to investigate how these existing guidelines could be strengthened to incorporate considerations of lived experience and moral responsibility for technology's impact.
Illustration for: What drives users to stay engaged with location-based games and build real-world communities?

Key question

What drives users to stay engaged with location-based games and build real-world communities?

Gamification for Community Building: Click to Shake Hands
Al Thani, Aoun, Vatanasakdakul · PACIS · 2025

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, allocate budget to pilot a location-based gamified application in one of our company's facilities, specifically focusing on fostering cross-departmental collaboration by integrating 'location incentives' for shared project spaces.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, schedule a meeting with your development team to discuss how to integrate elements like 'reward value' and 'achievement' into our existing internal communication platform to encourage more active participation and knowledge sharing.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, initiate a brainstorming session with your marketing and product teams to identify opportunities to leverage 'network influence' and 'herd behavior' in upcoming product launches or community outreach initiatives, perhaps by creating exclusive early-access groups.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, refine the survey instrument to include questions specifically measuring 'sense of belonging' and 'social motive' as distinct constructs, and prepare to recruit participants from diverse community groups for your next study.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, direct your staff to research successful public policy initiatives that have used location-based incentives or gamification to encourage citizen engagement with local services or community events, and identify potential applications for our jurisdiction.
Illustration for: How does adopting smart speakers change how consumers search for, buy, and consume digital content?

Key question

How does adopting smart speakers change how consumers search for, buy, and consume digital content?

The Voice of Commerce: How Smart Speakers Reshape Digital Content Consumption and Preferences
Son, Oh, Im · MIS Quarterly · 2023

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, task your team with investigating integration points between existing VOD platforms and major smart speaker voice assistant APIs (e.g., Alexa, Google Assistant) to enable seamless content discovery and playback via voice commands.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, analyze the current VOD platform's data infrastructure to identify how to track and log voice-initiated search queries and content playback events, distinguishing them from traditional remote control interactions.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, initiate a brainstorm session to explore new content promotion strategies that leverage voice-activated search, considering how to make titles more discoverable through natural language queries and conversational recommendations.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin outlining a follow-up study to quantify the correlation between specific conversational voice interactions (beyond simple search) and increased VOD content consumption, perhaps through A/B testing of voice-guided discovery features.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, convene a working group to assess the potential implications of increased voice-activated content consumption on digital accessibility standards and to explore how to ensure equitable access to content across all user interfaces.
Illustration for: How does collaborative course redesign affect student performance, teaching consistency, and instructor confidence?

Key question

How does collaborative course redesign affect student performance, teaching consistency, and instructor confidence?

Efficacy Beliefs and Outcomes: Socio-Cognitive Perspectives on a Faculty-Led coP
Muraski, Heath, Eierman, et al. · AIS SIGED Conference · 2023

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, schedule a 30-minute meeting with your IT academic technology support lead to explore a pilot program implementing a Communities of Practice model for a high-enrollment introductory course, using the provided research as a framework for discussion on potential student outcome improvements and faculty development.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, gather the instructors for the introductory information systems course for a 45-minute session. Share the key findings of this research, specifically highlighting the gains in student performance and instructor self-efficacy. Then, collaboratively brainstorm one small, concrete change to the course syllabus or assessment that can be implemented next semester as a collective first step towards greater consistency.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, analyze the current onboarding and ongoing professional development process for new faculty teaching foundational courses. Identify any gaps in collaborative support and informal learning opportunities, and consider how principles from this research, such as vicarious learning and peer persuasion, could be integrated into existing programs to improve faculty confidence and course consistency.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, begin drafting a proposal for a follow-up study. Focus on investigating the specific mechanisms of vicarious learning and peer verbal persuasion within the identified Community of Practice, perhaps through targeted surveys or observation protocols, to quantify their impact on instructor self-efficacy and to better understand how to scale these findings.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, initiate a discussion with the Provost's office and the Faculty Senate leadership to present the findings of this research. Propose the development of a university-wide framework or grant program that incentivizes and supports the formation of faculty Communities of Practice for foundational courses, emphasizing the potential for improved student learning outcomes and faculty development.
Illustration for: How can digital experimentation platforms help city leaders make better, more adaptive urban sustainability policies?

Key question New

How can digital experimentation platforms help city leaders make better, more adaptive urban sustainability policies?

How to Cope with the Dynamics of Urban Sustainability: Urban Experimentation Platforms as Tools for Adaptive Policy-Making
Rehm, McLoughlin, Donnellan · ECIS · 2022

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Audit current urban data platforms to ensure they include incoming feedback channels from local experimentation trials, rather than functioning solely as one-way broadcast tools.
  • IT Manager Configure dashboard alerts to aggregate and flag real-time stakeholder feedback and usage metrics from ongoing urban sustainability pilots.
  • Business Strategist Initiate a meeting with municipal authorities and local business ecosystem partners to design a recurring framework for collaborative problem-solving using platform data.
  • Researcher Apply system dynamics modeling to map the existing stakeholder feedback loops within your city's active urban experimentation platforms.
  • Policymaker Review the latest data reports from active local sustainability trials and draft a plan to update an existing municipal policy based on the trial results.
Illustration for: What causes organizational inertia during digital transformation, and how does it block successful change?

Key question New

What causes organizational inertia during digital transformation, and how does it block successful change?

Understanding Inertia in Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Multilevel Research Framework
Haskamp, Dremel, Marx, et al. · ICIS · 2021

Operations & Supply Chain

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive Audit your portfolio for socio-technical legacy IT misalignments by scheduling a joint review with department heads to identify legacy systems anchoring obsolete business routines.
  • IT Manager Map your team's current project workflows against the five inertia attributes to pinpoint where cognitive and behavioral rigidity is slowing down daily software deployment.
  • Business Strategist Review the 12 documented inertia antecedents against your current transformation roadmap to identify which cultural and structural barriers threaten your upcoming business model renewal.
  • Researcher Formulate a new empirical study focusing on the interactions between individual-level cognitive inertia and organizational-level structural inertia during enterprise cloud migrations.
  • Policymaker Draft guidelines for state-backed digital grants that require organizations to explicitly account for socio-technical and cultural inertia mitigation strategies before receiving funding.
Illustration for: How do board members' differing perspectives shape cybersecurity discussions and organizational resilience?

Key question

How do board members' differing perspectives shape cybersecurity discussions and organizational resilience?

Framing Dialogues on Cyber-Resilience on Boards
Rehm, Schaffner, Goel · ICIS · 2021

Cybersecurity & Privacy

What it means for you
  • CIO / IT Executive On Monday morning, prepare a concise, one-page executive summary for the board that translates the organization's current top 3 cyber threats into quantifiable business risks (e.g., potential revenue loss, reputational damage) and proposes specific, non-technical mitigation strategies with clear business outcomes. Avoid technical jargon; use analogies if necessary.
  • IT Manager On Monday morning, gather a brief (5-minute) overview of the most recent significant cybersecurity incident (internal or external to the company) and identify one specific, tangible lesson learned that can be communicated to non-technical stakeholders without overwhelming them with technical details.
  • Business Strategist On Monday morning, identify one strategic business objective for the upcoming quarter that is indirectly impacted by cybersecurity and brainstorm how a proactive cyber-resilience approach could enable or protect that objective. Frame this in terms of competitive advantage or market opportunity.
  • Researcher On Monday morning, review the 'Key Findings' section of your research and identify one specific, actionable question from each identified dysfunctional dialogue pattern (topic avoidance, political exploitation) that you can pose to a board member to gently guide them towards a more resilient discussion.
  • Policymaker On Monday morning, draft a short, one-paragraph statement for your next regulatory update that suggests a reporting framework for board-level cybersecurity oversight, focusing on the *outcomes* of cyber-resilience rather than prescriptive technical requirements.